Posts

You know that feeling when you’re staring at a five-line getter function, and your linter is screaming at you because coverage is at 87% instead of 95%? Yeah. That’s the moment I want to talk about. The testing community has done an incredible job evangelizing unit tests—and for good reason. Tests catch bugs, they provide confidence, they act as safety nets. But somewhere along the way, we’ve collectively developed test-writing religiosity....

Remember when system administrators had to manually configure servers like they were performing some kind of digital archaeology? Click here, configure that, restart this service, hope nothing breaks? Those days are long gone—welcome to the world of Infrastructure as Code, where Chef turns your chaotic server setup into reproducible, version-controlled declarations that would make any DevOps engineer weep tears of joy. If you’ve ever found yourself thinking “wouldn’t it be nice if I could just code my infrastructure the same way I code applications?...

There’s a widespread belief in software development circles that we should minimize complexity at all costs. It’s treated like a cardinal sin, whispered about in code reviews like some kind of software taboo. “Keep it simple,” they say. “Reduce complexity,” the metrics dashboards scream. But here’s the thing—I’m going to take a stance that might get me some raised eyebrows: complexity isn’t your enemy. Negligence is. Before you close this tab thinking I’ve lost my mind, hear me out....

Have you ever felt like most programming languages are trying too hard to be something they’re not? Like they wake up in the morning, look in the mirror, and think, “Today I’m going to be a pure functional language” or “No, actually, I’m strictly object-oriented”? Well, let me introduce you to Raku—the programming language that looked at all those rules and decided they were more like suggestions. Raku, formerly known as Perl 6 (yes, that Perl), is what happens when you take decades of Perl wisdom, throw in modern programming concepts, and refuse to compromise on expressiveness....

Look, I know what you’re thinking. “Beta software in production? That’s insane. That’s how companies end up on Reddit’s r/catastrophicfailure.” And you’re not entirely wrong—it can be a disaster. But here’s the thing: sometimes, calculated risks with beta software can actually strengthen your infrastructure, accelerate your innovation, and give you insights that months of internal testing simply cannot provide. Let me be clear upfront: this isn’t about deploying untested chaos to your production environment and hoping for the best....